晋太元中,武陵人捕鱼为业。缘溪行,忘路之远近。忽逢桃花林,夹岸数百步,中无杂树,芳草鲜美,落英缤纷。渔人甚异之,复前行,欲穷其林。 林尽水源,便得一山,山有小口,仿佛若有光。便舍船,从口入。初极狭,才通人。复行数十步,豁然开朗。土地平旷,屋舍俨然,有良田、美池、桑竹之属。阡陌交通,鸡犬相闻。其中往来种作,男女衣着,悉如外人。黄发垂髫,并怡然自乐。 见渔人,乃大惊,问所从来。具答之。便要还家,设酒杀鸡作食。村中闻有此人,咸来问讯。自云先世避秦时乱,率妻子邑人来此绝境,不复出焉,遂与外人间隔。问今是何世,乃不知有汉,无论魏晋。此人一一为具言所闻,皆叹惋。余人各复延至其家,皆出酒食。停数日,辞去。此中人语云:“不足为外人道也。”(间隔 一作:隔绝) 既出,得其船,便扶向路,处处志之。及郡下,诣太守,说如此。太守即遣人随其往,寻向所志,遂迷,不复得路。 南阳刘子骥,高尚士也,闻之,欣然规往。未果,寻病终。后遂无问津者。
|
Server : Apache System : Linux srv.rainic.com 4.18.0-553.47.1.el8_10.x86_64 #1 SMP Wed Apr 2 05:45:37 EDT 2025 x86_64 User : rainic ( 1014) PHP Version : 7.4.33 Disable Function : exec,passthru,shell_exec,system Directory : /usr/lib64/python2.7/Demo/metaclasses/ |
Upload File : |
"""Support Eiffel-style preconditions and postconditions.
For example,
class C:
def m1(self, arg):
require arg > 0
return whatever
ensure Result > arg
can be written (clumsily, I agree) as:
class C(Eiffel):
def m1(self, arg):
return whatever
def m1_pre(self, arg):
assert arg > 0
def m1_post(self, Result, arg):
assert Result > arg
Pre- and post-conditions for a method, being implemented as methods
themselves, are inherited independently from the method. This gives
much of the same effect of Eiffel, where pre- and post-conditions are
inherited when a method is overridden by a derived class. However,
when a derived class in Python needs to extend a pre- or
post-condition, it must manually merge the base class' pre- or
post-condition with that defined in the derived class', for example:
class D(C):
def m1(self, arg):
return arg**2
def m1_post(self, Result, arg):
C.m1_post(self, Result, arg)
assert Result < 100
This gives derived classes more freedom but also more responsibility
than in Eiffel, where the compiler automatically takes care of this.
In Eiffel, pre-conditions combine using contravariance, meaning a
derived class can only make a pre-condition weaker; in Python, this is
up to the derived class. For example, a derived class that takes away
the requirement that arg > 0 could write:
def m1_pre(self, arg):
pass
but one could equally write a derived class that makes a stronger
requirement:
def m1_pre(self, arg):
require arg > 50
It would be easy to modify the classes shown here so that pre- and
post-conditions can be disabled (separately, on a per-class basis).
A different design would have the pre- or post-condition testing
functions return true for success and false for failure. This would
make it possible to implement automatic combination of inherited
and new pre-/post-conditions. All this is left as an exercise to the
reader.
"""
from Meta import MetaClass, MetaHelper, MetaMethodWrapper
class EiffelMethodWrapper(MetaMethodWrapper):
def __init__(self, func, inst):
MetaMethodWrapper.__init__(self, func, inst)
# Note that the following causes recursive wrappers around
# the pre-/post-condition testing methods. These are harmless
# but inefficient; to avoid them, the lookup must be done
# using the class.
try:
self.pre = getattr(inst, self.__name__ + "_pre")
except AttributeError:
self.pre = None
try:
self.post = getattr(inst, self.__name__ + "_post")
except AttributeError:
self.post = None
def __call__(self, *args, **kw):
if self.pre:
apply(self.pre, args, kw)
Result = apply(self.func, (self.inst,) + args, kw)
if self.post:
apply(self.post, (Result,) + args, kw)
return Result
class EiffelHelper(MetaHelper):
__methodwrapper__ = EiffelMethodWrapper
class EiffelMetaClass(MetaClass):
__helper__ = EiffelHelper
Eiffel = EiffelMetaClass('Eiffel', (), {})
def _test():
class C(Eiffel):
def m1(self, arg):
return arg+1
def m1_pre(self, arg):
assert arg > 0, "precondition for m1 failed"
def m1_post(self, Result, arg):
assert Result > arg
x = C()
x.m1(12)
## x.m1(-1)
if __name__ == '__main__':
_test()